letra de conflict thesis (my verse is #4) - wc-drs

verse 1:
here we are once again, shoved in the middle of this eternal fray
shedding some light on common sense notions
blurring the line between non-and-sensical, in these disparaging days
looking at these old problems with a new outlook
was once undead, but knowledge in its wake
revived me, released from the deadly hooks of conundrums
is anyone there? sometimes i feel i’m preaching
to a deaf choir, mope like zombies yet misuse their eardrums
do i have to begin converting the english to sign language?
we all may hear sound, but how many us resound, for
picking volume doesn’t mean you can pickup the crumbs
to understand this world composed of auditory hallucinations, that surround
about why freedom, and dumb that are free, deafened
to discordant sound, still blind, never at time you once could see
the clues i drop for y’all to start making inductions
inferring that it seems to progress vs. congress heading off on
opposing courses, yet converging toward the same direction
does anyone get the problems, tangled together
questions and answers, useless dialectic, that dissolve solutions?

chorus:
socrates said “i know that i know i nothing” of the way to live
so we do we keep on frontin’, like einsteins, always boasting
therefore, stop playing god, pretending to be all knowing
arguing, berating, avoiding, k!lling, raping, lying, hurting, condemning, condescending to each other’s made up divine “image”
so i give my last effort to propose this gospel, synoptic
for all and any who happens to be a theist
who’s honest enough, to drop the 1st stone and hear this conflict thesis?

verse 2:
past, and present we think is what makes of the future
want to act precognitive, like fortune tellers
they can predict others destinies, yet not their own, which is why i’m unsure
always believing gossip, pointing each others
fingers at one another, like no one’s speech is slurred
confusing the difference between comprehending
aphasia and dyslexia, anorexic grammar, binging on words
just cause anything can sound out like t-r-u-t-h doesn’t mean it is, it ain’t
our lives are incomplete dictionaries, but why do we go by others’ thesauruses?
those who keeping speaking in tongues, making up neologisms
and modernistic slang, using big words, intellectually jur-ssic, prehistoric
contexts that don’t mean or refer to any exact thangs, pure absurdism
i dare you smart -sses, to say “think for yourself”
birdbrains saying i don’t have a crane-ium
when your dialect’s, full of rhetorical jargon’s that’s incoherent
as a african sage i say unto thee, to be simple and remove your inconsistencies
using your pseudo command of words, watch your mouth before judging
though i don’t agree irreligiously, i accept and acknowledge “only he can judge me”

(chorus)

verse 3:
yo, pay attention to my mastery of
my diction that is dope, we know “y” is next “z”
different letters, why can’t they be together
in semantic marriage, say it isn’t so?
add an “x” suddenly same-s-x of chromosomes
does it make a big difference? let me ask this
as natural selection, does everything have to be rigid?
didn’t the g*nius on general relativity, say objectively
“imagination is more important knowledge, for it’s unlimited and encircles the universe”
yet why as h0m-s (sapiens) do we always keep misinterpreting these
verses from bibles to phrases with lexicon, subjectively?
darwin saying we’re a species, but dawkins affirms
relatively, selfishness is our ultimate fate, genetically
as reality, one we have yet to see, but given the power ourselves to change
but he says there is no such as thing as “god gene”
instead, a single-replicating, all powerful molecule and this isn’t unverified theory?
it’s a suggestion, with no deistic gaps in my syllogistic arguments
unapologetic, unlike theologians, sorry if you get offended by my knack for questioning

(chorus)

verse 4:
there’s no creator? alright, but riddle me this
who is nature’s “selector”? principles of
variation, succession, migration, adaption, condition and fitness
yet who’s the most fit candidate, the mechanist
entirely responsible for quantum mechanics?
more invisible than gravity, yet there’s no universal lawgiver of ordinance?
the big bang, exploded in cosmic war, without a grenadier?
accountant, accountable for the exchange rates of expansion and contraction
remind yourself, not who but what else could have set these unchanging laws of
changing nature in constant, unfixed motion, to correspond
i haven’t said nor implied design, but serendipitous, yet you
conclude none of this is by random chance phenomena?
can’t fool me with the presumption of “who’s god’s god?”
a 2.0? well an effect without a primary cause that has come after first one
using the same nominal term for your nonexistent -ssertion, s
though somehow you don’t find none of that odd?
any skeptic should already know, no event “itself”
can be without its self-contingent cause
therefore catch your breath, give pause and
suffocate, telling me anything can exist, except
an unspecified, unproven, unknowable possibility
of there being, absolutely no uncaused cause
no prayer is necessary, i appreciate the scientists
but out of reasons of humility, i first thank god

verse 5:
human beings, are living fallacies
want to say beliefs are bad, but falsely believe science will prove everything
in fact is different, from practicing by custom, has to feel nurturing
putrid onion they all try to peel its layers, but no one reaches for the bulb
they couldn’t handle the smell of their own bullsh-t, so they cried
uncontrollably, lied in a puddle of their refutable, rationalized lies, adults curled, fetal
weak, babying, self-pitiful, trying to find a nipple of certainty to suck on, feeble
irrational behavior, doesn’t justify egotistical thinking
yet it’s not rational at all for the “all”
true to its actual definition, all does is just waste resources, and lose seconds
two sides constantly debating like it’s end of time
one concerned the “how” and “when”, the other with “what” and “why”
but where is the right place to propose this, without the threat to die or be denied?
must combine all our approaches to expand and survive
going forth and multiply, and abrupt this existential crisis of divide
holistically, on the holy path, rebuking truth, from twisted tongue lies
using not inductive, deductive, abductive, but “adductive” reasoning
as humanity, we should not go back to knowledge, but -ssess the tree of life
barking up brother’s and sister’s trees, wrongly on grounds
intolerant misunderstanding, halt this childish bickering
for once and for all, as cowardly bulldogs vs. dogmatic bloodhounds
we have to redefine what we keep interchanging, evolution as change, creationism as genesis
the earth isn’t flat, it’s circular, but our logic is square, going round and round to nowhere
one tries to offer beginnings, the other origins, both failed a divergent quest, to mold a synthesis
back to the drawing board, how the h-ll in heaven did this is all come to fruition?

- wc drs

letras aleatórias

MAIS ACESSADOS